<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>/* Rambling comments... */</title>
<link>http://www.lenholgate.com/</link>
<description>Len Holgate&apos;s thoughts on this and that...
Mainly test driven software development in C++ on Windows platforms... - Dumbing down is dumb</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Len.Holgate@JetByte.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-07T09:57:58+00:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=2.64" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Implicit Interfaces</title>
<link>http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000610.html</link>
<description>

ImplicitInterfaceImplementation - from Martin Fowler is an interesting piece where Martin suggests that it would be useful to be able to provide alternative implementations of a class&apos;s implicit interface. That is, given a class that does not inherit from an...

<![CDATA[<div class="posted">Posted by Len at <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000610.html">09:57 AM</a>
		| <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/mt/mt-comments-17.cgi?entry_id=610" >Comments (0)</a>
	
	
| Categories: <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_dumbing_down_is_dumb.html">Dumbing down is dumb</a>
, <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_testing.html">Testing</a>

	</div>]]>

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">610@http://www.lenholgate.com/</guid>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-01-07T09:57:58+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>If you enjoyed the Petzold thing earlier...</title>
<link>http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000556.html</link>
<description>

This may also be your kinda thing. Ellen Ullman&apos;s 1998 two part series &quot;The Dumbing-Down of Programming&quot; from Salon archives. Rebelling against Microsoft, &quot;My Computer&quot; and easy-to-use Wizards, an engineer rediscovers the joys of difficult computing. Returning to the Source....

<![CDATA[<div class="posted">Posted by Len at <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000556.html">09:50 PM</a>
		| <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/mt/mt-comments-17.cgi?entry_id=556" >Comments (0)</a>
	
	
| Categories: <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_dumbing_down_is_dumb.html">Dumbing down is dumb</a>
, <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_geek_speak.html">Geek Speak</a>

	</div>]]>

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">556@http://www.lenholgate.com/</guid>
<dc:subject>Geek Speak</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2005-10-25T21:50:12+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sacrificing precision for ease of use? </title>
<link>http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000506.html</link>
<description>

I&apos;m probably jumping the gun a little here as I can&apos;t find Herb Sutter&apos;s slides that Matt Pietrek is referring to, but... Once again I find myself asking why is it actually useful to repurpose the auto keyword in C++......

<![CDATA[<div class="posted">Posted by Len at <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000506.html">11:15 AM</a>
		| <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/mt/mt-comments-17.cgi?entry_id=506" >Comments (6)</a>
	
	
| Categories: <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_dumbing_down_is_dumb.html">Dumbing down is dumb</a>
, <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_geek_speak.html">Geek Speak</a>

	</div>]]>

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">506@http://www.lenholgate.com/</guid>
<dc:subject>Geek Speak</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2005-09-17T11:15:50+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>C# v3 Extension methods, syntactic sugar for the lack of free functions?</title>
<link>http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000504.html</link>
<description>

There&apos;s a lot of noise coming out of the Microsoft PDC right now. Something that interested me was the future direction of C#; you can grab the spec from here. It seems they&apos;re adding &quot;extension methods&quot; which, to me, appear...

<![CDATA[<div class="posted">Posted by Len at <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000504.html">03:12 PM</a>
		| <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/mt/mt-comments-17.cgi?entry_id=504" >Comments (7)</a>
	
	
| Categories: <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_net.html">.Net</a>
, <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_dumbing_down_is_dumb.html">Dumbing down is dumb</a>
, <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_geek_speak.html">Geek Speak</a>

	</div>]]>

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">504@http://www.lenholgate.com/</guid>
<dc:subject>Geek Speak</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2005-09-16T15:12:36+00:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Some thoughts on complexity</title>
<link>http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000269.html</link>
<description>

I find that these days I prefer my complexity to be obvious. Things with hidden complexity aren&apos;t any less complex, they&apos;re just less obvious. If you make all of your complexity obvious then you know which pieces of code are complex and you can focus your attempts at simplification on the right places...

<![CDATA[<div class="posted">Posted by Len at <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/000269.html">01:57 PM</a>
		| <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/mt/mt-comments-17.cgi?entry_id=269" >Comments (0)</a>
	
	
| Categories: <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_dumbing_down_is_dumb.html">Dumbing down is dumb</a>
, <a href="http://www.lenholgate.com/archives/cat_socket_servers.html">Socket Servers</a>

	</div>]]>

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">269@http://www.lenholgate.com/</guid>
<dc:subject>Socket Servers</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2004-02-29T13:57:12+00:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
