Setup and TearDown considered harmful?

I'm glad that Brian Button went to the trouble of writing this post and thinking through the implications of shared setup and teardown code in tests. I've been a bit concerned about some of my tests for a while now. You see, I don't use a fancy framework, I just write them myself in C++ and generally there isn't much shared setup code because I don't find it that useful. Brian's insight that the duplication present in tests is often a good thing because it allows the test to communicate more clearly is pretty much what I've thought for a while. I just never had the time to sit down and think it all through myself. :)

Leave a comment